
Expressway argued that the real thrust of Slep-Tone's complaint was to challenge the copying of the media- and format-shifted recordings, which is in the nature of copyright infringement, not trademark infringement. Judge Carter noted that the "case may toe the line between a trademark claim attempting an 'end run around the copyright laws' and a viable trademark claim," but that "regardless of the copyright status of these videos, Slep-Tone alleges facts about the misuse of its trademark on products it did not create, namely because Slep-Tone's registered trade dress and trademark appear on Expressway's media- and format-shifted tracks. These are cognizable claims under the Lanham Act."